In observing atheists’ and evangelists’ arguments I have noted what seems to be a major disagreement on what the word “truth” means.
Evangelical people use “truth” to mean unprovable facts, what scientists generally call axioms.
The scientific/atheistic authors use “truth” to mean ’empirically verifiable statement’.
The scientist uses the word as agreed upon with his peers for precision in speech as scientific discourse requires thoughts to be stated in a provable format , while the religious person is mostly trying to establish their ranking in their society of fellow believers by clear and emphatic statements showing their loyalty to the tribe.
There really isn’t much point in discussions with such a disparate use of words, and in fact even the scientists are mostly seeking peer approval via their words rather than to get the evangelicals to evaluate reality.